Tuesday, July 05, 2005

Save the 1st Amendment from Karl Rove

No sooner do I finish posting my previous entry than I find this article at Editor & Publisher from a Texas journalist who taught a class on politics and the media with Rove in the late 1990's. This guy gets it....

The problem, as always, in dealing with Rove, is establishing a clear chain of culpability. Rove once described himself as a die-hard Nixonite; he is, like the former president, both student and master of plausible deniability. (This past weekend, in confirming that Rove was indeed a source for Matthew Cooper, Rove's lawyer said his client "never knowingly disclosed classified information.") That is precisely why prosecutor Fitzgerald in this case must document the pattern of Rove’s behavior, whether journalists published, or not.

For in this case, Rove, improving on Macchiavelli, has bet that reporters won’t rat their relationship with the administration’s most important political source. How better for him to operate without constraint, or to camouflage breaking the law, than under the cover of journalists and journalism, protected by the First Amendment?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home